Every child deserves safe, high-quality child care and education. Research shows how critical early childhood education and development are to long-term achievement and socio-emotional outcomes. The quality of child care is important as it directly impacts a child’s development, including the ability to learn and to build healthy relationships. Additionally, the Santa Barbara Foundation recognizes that child care is essential to the wellbeing, prosperity, and future of our county; is a critical element of community infrastructure; is crucial for economic vitality and workplace participation; is strengthened by skilled, valued and well-supported educators; is an investment in our collective future; and is a shared responsibility and a shared opportunity.
The demand for child care services exceeds the supply of available spots in Santa Barbara County and particularly for infants and toddlers. This has led to an increased need for child care providers. However, if providers are unable to staff their centers adequately, they must limit the number of children they can care for resulting in underserved families and higher prices for the limited available spots. In Santa Barbara County, child care accounts for 28% of a family’s income and is a greater monthly expense than housing.1
To increase organizational capacity amongst nonprofit child care providers and meet the critical needs of our communities’ youngest members, the Santa Barbara Foundation is offering a grant program in support of quality early care and education programs and the services that support and enable their success. This work aligns with the Santa Barbara County Child Care Facilities Master Plan (2025–2030), a countywide effort to create 3,000 new licensed child care spaces by June 2030. This year’s grant cycle will support the Santa Barbara Foundation’s Child Care Initiative by prioritizing funding that strengthens child care providers and the child care system in the County of Santa Barbara for children ages 0-5.
Eligibility Requirements
Criteria by Type of Project
The Santa Barbara Foundation offers this funding to support and strengthen child care providers (for children between birth and five years of age) and the direct service providers that support them. Applicants must identify one primary project type from the three below and build their application around it.
Workforce Pathway and Skill Development
Projects should strengthen the pipeline of qualified infant and toddler professionals in the County, increasing the number of educators/workforce professionals who are trained, credentialed, and retained.
Illustrative Project Examples
Organizational Development and Business Sustainability
Projects should build the organizational backbone that allows a provider to operate, sustain, and/or grow quality care.
Illustrative Project Examples
Family Engagement and Inclusive Practice
Projects should build strong relationships with families and serve all children well, including diverse and high-need populations, in a manner cognizant of each family’s composition, language, and culture.
Illustrative Project Examples
Priorities
Priority will be given to organizations that:
Funding Amounts and Duration
The maximum award for Child Care Grants is $15,000. Please note that based on funding availability, award amounts could be less than requested. The grant period is up to one year from the award date and reporting requirements will be noted in the award letter.
Grant funds must be tied to the specific project proposed under the applicant’s chosen project type. Project-related costs — including staff time, training, coaching, or materials directly required to carry out the proposed project — are allowable. General operating support that is not connected to the proposed project is not funded.
Grant Limitations
Child Care grants are not intended for:
Please visit the Eligibility Criteria & FAQs for a complete list of what the foundation does not fund.
Important Dates
| Thursday, August 13, 2026, 9:00 – 11:30 a.m. | Office hours: virtual |
| Tuesday, August 18, 2026, 11:00 a.m. – 1:00 p.m. | Office hours: SBF Santa Barbara office |
| Wednesday, August 19, 2026, 12:30 – 3:00 p.m. | Office hours: SBF Santa Maria office |
| September 1, 2026 | Application deadline |
| Late October 2026 | Funds awarded |
Application Process
Applications must be submitted through our SmartSimple grant application, which includes the following documents:
Refer to our website for more information: https://sbfoundation.org/nonprofits/how-to-apply/
Contact Information
If you have questions about the suitability of your Child Care grant proposal prior to drafting your application, we encourage you to contact Tatyana Venegas Swanson, tswanson@sbfoundation.org or Kelly Lazarus, klazarus@SBFoundation.org.
Scale: 4 (Highest) to 1 (Lowest) | 5 Criteria | Maximum Score: 20 Points | All criteria weighted equally
| Criteria | 4 — Exceptional | 3 — Strong | 2 — Developing | 1 — Insufficient |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Alignment with Program Priorities & Project Type Score based on the applicant’s chosen project type. |
Project strongly aligns with the stated priorities for its Project Type and clearly addresses one or more with compelling evidence. Fits within or meaningfully contributes to a larger plan or strategy. | Project aligns well with the priorities for its Project Type, with adequate supporting evidence. Some connection to a broader plan or strategy is evident. | Project partially aligns with program priorities. Evidence is limited or the connection to the project type is unclear. Tenuous or absent link to any larger plan. | Minimal or no alignment. Project does not clearly fit any project type, or lacks sufficient supporting rationale. |
| Strategic Vision & Goals | Clear, comprehensive vision with specific, measurable goals, actionable strategies, and a well-defined timeline for the grant period. Milestones are clearly articulated. Demonstrates a forward-thinking approach that strengthens long-term impact and organizational or project sustainability beyond the grant. | Solid vision with defined goals, strategies, and a general timeline. Key milestones present though some may lack specificity. Some attention to sustainability, though elements may lack full detail. | General goals described, but the timeline is vague or incomplete and milestones are unclear. Appears more reactive than proactive, with limited planning for sustainability beyond project delivery. | Goals are vague or lack a clear framework. No clear timeline or milestones. Little or no plan for sustaining the work after the grant period. |
| Awareness & Coordination | Demonstrates clear awareness of relevant resources, organizations, and efforts in the applicant’s project type (e.g., the Child Care Planning Council, Children’s Resource & Referral), and shows how the project connects to or draws on them. Where the project relies on partners, roles are well defined and strengthen the work, and any required MOUs or formal agreements are in place. Where the project extends beyond the applicant’s own organization, it clearly complements rather than duplicates existing efforts. | Shows solid awareness of relevant resources and efforts and a reasonable account of how the project connects to or draws on them. Any partnerships strengthen implementation, though roles may not be fully developed. Required agreements are present. Where applicable, a reasonable case for complementing existing efforts is made. | Shows some awareness of relevant resources or efforts, but gives limited attention to how the project connects to or draws on them. Partnerships, if any, are noted but not well integrated. | Little or no awareness of relevant resources or efforts in the space. Partnerships or required agreements are missing where they would be expected, or, for projects extending beyond the organization, the risk of duplication is unaddressed. |
| Community Benefit, Reach & Access | Demonstrates meaningful and clearly quantified benefit to children, families, and/or the workforce. Identifies who and how many will be served and, where applicable, how the project creates or preserves licensed capacity. Strong attention to serving underserved or high-need populations. | Notable benefit with a reasonable estimate of reach. Some attention to capacity and to underserved populations, though scope or depth may be limited. | Benefit is modest or indirect. Reach is loosely estimated. Limited consideration of capacity or of underserved populations. | Little or no demonstrated benefit. Reach is unclear or unstated. No meaningful consideration of access or high-need populations. |
| Measurement, Evaluation & Learning | Detailed, feasible plan with specific data-collection methods and tools clearly identified (e.g., enrollment or staffing records, surveys, tracking systems, financials). Clear processes for analyzing data and using findings to inform decisions and improvements during the grant period. | Solid plan with defined methods, tools, and analysis approaches, including how findings will be used, though some elements may lack specificity. | Basic plan with some identified methods and general analysis. Limited detail on how findings will inform decisions or improvements. | Plan is vague or absent, lacking specifics on tools, methods, or use of findings. Feasibility is questionable. |
Reviewers should apply the guidance below when scoring Criterion 1, based on the project type indicated in the application.
Workforce Pathway and Skill Development. Assess whether the project strengthens the pipeline of qualified infant and toddler professionals — through training, credentialing, coaching, or retention. Consider how clearly the project increases the number or quality of educators and connects to broader workforce efforts in the County.
Organizational Development and Business Sustainability. Assess whether the project strengthens the organizational backbone that allows a provider to operate, sustain, and grow quality care — through leadership, operations, data use, facilities, or business sustainability. Consider the soundness of the approach and its potential to create or stabilize licensed capacity.
Family Engagement and Inclusive Practice. Assess whether the project builds meaningful relationships with families and serves all children well, including diverse and high-need populations. Consider the strength of the engagement strategy and how effectively it responds to family composition, language, culture, and access.
| Score Range | Priority Level | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 18–20 | Priority for Funding | Exceptional applications that strongly meet all criteria. Compelling project merit, clear strategy, strong capacity, and meaningful community benefit. |
| 14–17 | High Consideration for Funding | Strong applications meeting most criteria well, with minor gaps. |
| 9–13 | Consider for Funding | Solid applications addressing program priorities but lacking depth in strategy, evidence, or capacity. |
| 5–8 | Low Priority; May Fund if Resources Allow | Significant gaps in one or more criteria. Limited alignment or unclear capacity. |
| 0–4 | Does Not Meet Criteria for Funding | Insufficient alignment with program goals. Purpose unclear, lacks direction, or does not meet eligibility. |